Skip to main content

Natural Disasters, Urban Vulnerability, and Risk Management: A Theoretical Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Interplay between Urban Development, Vulnerability, and Risk Management

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace ((MEDITERRAN,volume 7))

Abstract

In his foreword to “Living with Risk,” the United Nations’ Secretary General, Kofi Annan raised awareness to human-induced conditions that increase vulnerability to natural disasters. Rapid urbanization and land degradation, globalization and socio-economic poverty, global warming and climate change are among the global trends that affect the world at large and result in the severity, if not be the cause of natural disasters.

Communities will always face natural hazards, but today’s disasters are often generated by, or at least exacerbated by, human activities… At no time in human history have so many people lived in cities clustered around seismically active areas. Destitution and demographic pressure have led more people than ever before to live in flood plains or in areas prone to landslides. Poor land-use planning; environmental management; and a lack of regulatory mechanisms both increase the risk and exacerbate the effects of disasters.

Kofi Annan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Annan, Kofi, 2002: Foreword to Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives, (UN/ISDR). Quoted in UN/ISDR, 2003: Disaster Reduction and Sustainable Development. A background paper for the World Summit on Sustainable Development; http://www.unisdr.org (2006):1.

  2. 2.

    In simplest terms, urbanization is an increasing proportion of a population living in settlements defined as urban centers (Satterthwaite 2005: 2). The immediate cause of most urbanization is the net movement of people from rural to urban areas (which is mostly higher than urban to rural migration). It is important to note that national governments set their own population benchmarks to define what constitutes an urban area. Therefore, the scale of the world’s urban population may vary according to different national standards.

  3. 3.

    The proportion of people living in cities is lower than the proportion living in urban centers, as a significant proportion of people live in urban centers that are too small to be called cities (Satterthwaite 2005: 22). In this book, the term urban area will be used to identify both urban centers, cities, and their agglomerations.

  4. 4.

    Mega-cities are cities with populations of ten million people or more. The United Nations first used the term in the 1970s to designate urban areas with populations of eight million or more. The threshold was increased in the 1990s.

  5. 5.

    According to the 2010 UN population estimates, Paris, Jakarta, Kinshasa and Guangzhou (Guangdong) are other urban areas that will reach populations over ten million people by the year 2020.

  6. 6.

    According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), climate change “refers to any change in climate over time, whether due to natural variability or as a result of human activity” (McCarthy et al. 2001: 3).

  7. 7.

    Munich Re Group 2005: Megacities—Megarisks: Trends and Challenges for Insurance and Risk Management. Munich Re Group Knowledge Series; at: http:www.munichre.com (2006):25.

  8. 8.

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001).

  9. 9.

    The World Bank (WB) defines poverty as an unacceptable deprivation in human well-being; which goes beyond the traditional view as measured by income or consumption; but that includes basic material needs including adequate nutrition, health, education, and shelter as well as social needs including security and empowerment (WB 2001; Ames et al. 2002). According to the World Bank’s Poverty Reduction Strategies, urban poverty is explained with dimensions of income poverty, health and education poverty, personal and tenure security, and disempowerment (Baharoglu and Kessides 2002).

  10. 10.

    Informal settlements have recently been defined and used under the large umbrella of the term slum. Standard and operational understandings of slums include both its traditional definition as declining housing areas that have deteriorated with the movement of their original dwellers to new and better areas of the cities, as well as informal settlements in urban periphery of mostly developing nations and that encompass both squatter settlements and illegal subdivisions (UN-Habitat 2003: 9). In this book, the terms slum and informal settlements are used interchangeably.

  11. 11.

    Communication with Prof. Dr. Selim Karpuz.

  12. 12.

    Dodman et al. (2009).

  13. 13.

    The popularisation of pueblos jovenes in official terminology, instead of the former term of tugurios (inner-city slums) and barriadas (squatter communities), is argued to be an attempt of authorities “to address the damaging effect of prejudice against slums” (UN-Habitat 2003: 10).

  14. 14.

    It should be noted that shanties or slums in Mumbai are a combination of peripheral and inner-city settlements. Indeed, one of these inner city squatter settlements, Dharavi, which was the largest slum in Asia in the 1980 s, has a population estimated to be somewhere between 500,000 and 1 million people, but today there are four other slums in Mumbai larger than Dharavi. “Dharavi in Mumbai is no longer Asia’s largest slum”, in The Times of India (6 Jul 2011).

  15. 15.

    United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2004): 61.

  16. 16.

    Dodman et al. (2009): 29–30.

  17. 17.

    A similar slum clearance campaign is experienced today in Rio de Janeiro as the government is preparing for the 2016 Olympic Games and pushing out drug gangs in the favelas and these slums are now turning into lucrative real estate opportunities for the wealthy.

  18. 18.

    Dodman et al. (2009).

  19. 19.

    Baker (2006).

  20. 20.

    Baker (2006): 1.

  21. 21.

    Baker (2006): 2.

  22. 22.

    Baker (2006): 23.

  23. 23.

    Baker (2006): 23.

  24. 24.

    Meli and Alcocer (2004: 33) explains that “the rate of distress and failure suffered by school and hospital buildings after major earthquakes is consistently higher than, or at least equal to, than of other common buildings.” They argue for the existence of two major reasons for this high rate of damage. One is related with “inconsistency among design seismic-induced loads, expected performance, and design and detailing rules,” and “the second reason is related to the more complex and irregular structural layouts” of these buildings (Meli and Alcocer 2004: 33).

  25. 25.

    In studying Latin American cities, Gilbert (1996: 93) argued that “hilly cities are arguably less clearly polarized than flat cities,” as high-income and middle-income areas develop in close proximity to barrios and favelas on steep slopes unsuitable for formal-sector construction. Gilbert (1996: 93) wrote: “Here, every exclusive residential development appears to have its low-income neighbour next door. A functional symbiosis has developed; the urbanización provides work for the maids, shoe menders, laundresses, and the like, and the barrio provides cheap labor”.

  26. 26.

    “Japanese architect falsified earthquake data”, in Architectural Record, 2006. News Briefs.

  27. 27.

    “Earth-shaking news”, in Economist (December 2005): 46.

  28. 28.

    These were survey studies on local government approaches to hazards. There was a high survey response rate ranging between 75 and 90 %; and types of informants were local planning directors or designees, and local flood coordinators. For more information on floodplain hazards, see “Coping with floods” (Burby and French 1981) and Flood Plain Land Use Management (Burby and French 1985). For coastal storms and hurricanes, see Catastrophic Coastal Storms (Godschalk et al. 1989). For earthquakes, see “A national assessment of local earthquake mitigation” (Berke et al. 1992), and for multiple natural hazards see Sharing Environmental Risks (Burby et al. 1991), and Factors Promoting Comprehensive Local Government Hazards Management (Kartez and Faupel 1995).

  29. 29.

    These are conclusions derived from the following studies: The Politics and Economics of Earthquake Hazard Mitigation (Alesch and Petak 1986); “Hurricane vertical shelter policy” (Berke 1989); “A national assessment of local earthquake mitigation” (Berke et al. 1992); Flood Plain Land Use Management (Burby and French 1985); “Mandates, plans and planners” (Dalton and Burby 1994); Earthquake Mitigation Policy (Drabek et al. 1983); Catastrophic Coastal Storms (Godschalk et al. 1989); Analysis of Adoption and Implementation of Community Land-use Regulations for Floodplains (Hutton et al. 1979); Role of States in Earthquake and Natural Hazard Innovation at the Local Level (Lambright 1984); Seismic Hazard in the Central United States (Olhansky 1994); and Preparing for California’s Earthquakes: Local Government and Seismic Safety (Wyner and Mann 1986).

  30. 30.

    Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS) (2002).

  31. 31.

    Among them were statewide Florida, large cities and counties in Nevada, coastal region in North Carolina, statewide Oregon, coastal California, and growth management jurisdictions in Washington State (Steinberg and Burby 2002: 23).

  32. 32.

    Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2001).

  33. 33.

    Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2001).

  34. 34.

    Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2006).

  35. 35.

    Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2006): 26–28.

  36. 36.

    See “Governing Land Use in Hazardous Areas with a Patchwork System” (May and Deyle 1998: 57–82) for legal programs and policies that influence land-use and development in hazard-prone areas.

  37. 37.

    United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2004): 63.

  38. 38.

    Satterthwaite (2011): 16–17.

  39. 39.

    See “Disaster management plan for the State of Maharashtra, India” (Vatsa and Joseph 2003) for the Mumbai case.

  40. 40.

    According to the UN-Habitat’s Governance Campaign, principles of “good urban governance” is characterized by sustainability in all dimensions of urban development, subsidiarity of authority and resources to the closest appropriate level, equity of access to decision-making processes and the basic necessities of urban life, efficiency in the delivery of public services and in promoting local economic development, transparency and accountability of decision-makers and all stakeholders, civic engagement and citizenship, and security of individuals and their living environment. United Nations Human Settlements Program (UN-Habitat), 2004: Principles of Good Urban Governance; at: http://www.unhabitat.org (2006):3–7.

  41. 41.

    Satterthwaite (2011): 19.

References

  • Ames B, Brown W, Devarajan S, Izquierdo A (2002) Macroeconomic issues. In: Klugman J (ed): A sourcebook for poverty reduction strategies, vol 2. World Bank, Washington, pp 3−27

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesch DJ, Petak WJ (1986) The politics and economics of earthquake hazard mitigation. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Baharoglu D, Kessides C (2002) Urban poverty. In: Klugman J (ed) A sourcebook for poverty reduction strategies, vol 2. World Bank, Washington, pp 123–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JL (2006a) Integrated urban upgrading for the poor: the experience of Ribeira Azul, Salvador, Brazil. World Bank policy research working paper 3861. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2006/02/22/000016406_20060222115502/Rendered/PDF/wps3861.pdf

  • Bankoff G (2003) Vulnerability as a measure of change in society. Mass Emerg Disasters 21(2):5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard R (2003) Democracy, storytelling, and the sustainable city. In: Eckstein B, Thogmorton JA (eds) Story and sustainability. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 65−77. Quoted in Fainstein S (2005) Planning theory and the city. J Plann Educ Res 25:121−130, 126

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke PR (1989) Hurricane vertical shelter policy: the experience of Florida and Texas. Coast Manag 17:193−217

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke PR, Beatley T (1992) A national assessment of local earthquake mitigation: implications for planning and public policy. Earthq Spectra 8(1):1−15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigio AG (2003) Cities and Climate Change In: Kreimer A, Arnold M, Carlin A (eds) Building safer cities. Disaster risk management series no: 3, World Bank, Washington, pp 91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt B (2004) Earthquakes, 5th edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody SD (2003) Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. J Plann Educ Res 23:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby RJ, French SP (1981) Coping with floods: the land use management paradox. J Am Plann Assoc 47:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby R. French SP (1985) Flood plain land use management: a national assessment. In: Cigler B, Kaiser EJ, Moreau DH, Stiftel B (eds) Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby RJ, Cigler BA, French SP, Kaiser EJ, Kartez J, Roenigk D, Weist D, Whittington D (1991) Sharing environmental Risks: How to control government’s losses in natural disasters. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter S (ed) (2001) American hazardscapes: the regionalization of hazards and disasters. Joseph Henry Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton L, Burby RJ (1994) “Mandates, plans, and planners: building local commitment to development management. J Am Plann Assoc 60 (Autumn):444−462

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (1998) Ecology of fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster. Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger K (2003) Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. A orld Bank policy research report. World Bank/Oxford University Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodman D, Hardoy J, Sattherwaite D (2009) Urban development and intensive and 1154 extensive risk. Background paper to the 2009 global assessment report on disaster risk 1155 reduction, Geneva. http://www.preventionweb.net/1156 english/hyogo/gar/background-papers/

  • Drabek TE, Mushkatel AH, Kilijanek TS (1983) Earthquake mitigation policy: the experience of two states. program on environment and behavior. Monograph 31 institute of behavioral science, University of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) (2003) The boumerdes, algeria, earthquake May 21, 2003: An EERI learning from earthquakes reconnaissance report

    Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran H, Berberoglu S, Cangir C, Boyraz D, Zucca C, Ozevren E, Yazici E, Zdruli P, Dingil M, Donmez C, Akca E, Celik I, Watanabe T, Koca YK, Montanarella L, Cherlet M, Kapur S (2011) The anthroscape approach in sustainable land use. In Kapur S, Eswaran H, Blum WEH (eds) Sustainable land management: learning from the past for the future. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2001) State and local mitigation planning how-to-guide: understanding your risks.http://www.fema.org (2006)

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2006) Multi-jurisdictional mitigation planning: state and local mitigation planning how-to-guide 368–368. http://www.fema.org

  • Gencer EA (2007) The interplay between natural disasters, vulnerability, and sustainable development. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gencer EA (2008) Natural disasters, vulnerability, and sustainable development: examining the interplay, global trends, and local practices in Istanbul. VDM Verlag, Saarbrucken

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert A (1996) Land, housing, and infrastructure in Latin America’s major cities. In: Gilbert A (ed) The mega-city in latin America. The United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 73–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk DR, Brower DJ, Beatley T (1989) Catastrophic coastal storms: hazard mitigation and development management. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardoy J, Satterthwaite D (1993) Housing policies: a review of changing government attitudes and responses to city housing problems in the third world. In: Cheema GS (ed) Urban management: policies and innovations in developing countries, 111–159 Praeger Publishers, Tokyo. United Nations University, Honolulu. Hawaii East–West Center, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton JR, Mileti DS, Lord WB, Sorensen JH, Waterstone M (1979) Analysis of adoption and implementation of community land-use regulations for floodplains. Woodward-Clyde Consultants, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS) (2002) Are we planning safer communities? Results of a national survey of community planners and natural Disasters. http://www.ibhs.org/publications

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability summary for policy makers and technical summary for working group II report, IPCC, Geneva. Quoted in UNDP (2004) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development, 69. http://www.undp.org/bcpr

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2012) Summary for policymakers. In: Fields CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner GK, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: a special report of the working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kante B (2005) The urban–rural environment linkages: integrating the brown and green environment agendas. in UN-Habitat, Urban-Rural Linkages Approach to Sustainable Development, 244–255 (UN-Habitat)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartez J, Faupel C (1995) Factors promoting comprehensive local government hazards management. In: From the mountains to the sea—developing local capabilities. Proceedings of the nineteenth annual conference of the association of state floodplain managers. Natural hazards research and applications information center special publication 31. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambright WH (1984) Role of states in earthquake and natural hazard innovation at the local level: a decision making study. National Technical Information Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Laquian A (2005) Beyond metropolis. Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontidou L (1990) The mediterranean city in transition: social change and urban development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Masselos J (1995) Postmodern Bombay: fractured discourses. In: Watson S, Gibson K (eds) Postmodern cities and spaces. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 199–215

    Google Scholar 

  • May PJ, Deyle RE (1998) Governing land use in hazardous areas with a patchwork system. In: Burby RJ (ed) Cooperating with nature: confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, pp 57–82

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy JOJ, Canziani F, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan G, Jacobi P, Songsore J, Surjadi C, Kjellén M (2001) The citizens at risk: from urban sanitation to sustainable cities. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Meli R (1993) Earthquake resistant design and construction of reinforced concrete buildings: the practice in Mexico after 1985. In: Proceedings of the 1993 structures congress: structural engineering in natural hazard mitigation, vol 1. ASCE, New York pp 229–234. Quoted in Meli R, Alcocer SM (2004) Implementation of structural earthquake-disaster mitigation programs in developing countries. Nat Hazards Rev 5(1):31

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti DS (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Meli R, Alcocer SM (2004) Implementation of structural earthquake-disaster mitigation programs in developing countries. Nat Hazards Rev 5(1)29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Olhansky RB (1994) Seismic hazard in the central United States: the role of the states. Professional Paper 1538-G. Geological Survey, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshansky RB, Kartez JD (1998) Managing land use to build resilience. In: Burby RJ (ed) Cooperating with nature: confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, pp 167–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith A (1999) Lima, Peru: underdevelopment and vulnerability to hazards in the city of the kings. In: Mitchell JK (ed) Crucibles of hazard: mega-cities and disasters in transition. United Nations University Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman JE (1993) Mega-cities: global urbanization and Innovation. In: Cheema GS (ed) Urban management: policies and innovations in developing countries. Praeger Publishers, United Nations University, East-West Center, Westport, pp 19–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzoli K (1998) Human settlements and planning for ecological sustainability: the case of Mexico City. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Puente S (1999) Social vulnerability to disasters in Mexico City: an assessment method. In: Mitchell JK (ed) Crucibles of hazard: mega-cities and disasters in transition. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 295–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs J (2005) The end of poverty: economic possibilities for our time. The Penguin Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson D (2000) Cities, disasters and livelihoods. Environ Urbanization 12(2):93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite D (2005) The scale and nature of urban change worldwide: 1950–2000 and its underpinnings. Human settlement discussion paper series. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite D (2011) What role for low-income communities in urban areas in disaster risk reduction?” Background paper to the 2011 global assessment report on disaster risk reduction, Geneva http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/backgroundpapers/ pp 16−17

  • Sattherwaite D, Cecilia T (2002) Seeking an understanding of poverty that recognizes rural-urban linkages. In: Rakoli C, Lloyd-Jones T (eds) Urban livelihoods: a people centered approach, Earthscan, London, pp 52–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg M, Burby RJ (2002) Growing safe. Planning 68(4):2–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaliviero M (2006) Integrating slum upgrading and vulnerability reduction in Mozambique. Open House Int 31(1):106–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvers E (2004) Build illegally on Italy’s land and amnesty law will come. New York Times

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (2005) Report of the world conference on disaster reduction. A/CONF.206/6, Kobe, Hyogo

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (2010) Local governments and disaster risk reduction: good practices and lessons learned. UNISDR, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (2012) How to make cities more resilient: a handbook for local government leaders. UNISDR, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) Millenium Project (2005) A home in the city. Task force on improving the lives of slum dwellers. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2004) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for developmenthttp://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/crisis%20prevention/disaster/asia_pacific/Reducing%20Disaster%20risk%20a%20Challenge%20for%20development.pdf,p 61

  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2003) The challenge of slums: global report on human settlements 2003. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2009) Planning sustainable cities: global report on human settlements 2009. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2011) Global report on human settlements: cities and climate change. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR) (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives, 2 vols. United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR) (2009) UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction, UN/ISDR, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Division (UNPD) (2002) World urbanization prospects: the 2001 revision, data tables and highlights. New York. http://www.un.org/esa/population. Quoted in UN-Habitat: The Challenge of Slums: Global Report on Human Settlements, 26 (London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan)

  • United States (US) Congress (2000) Disaster mitigation act of 2000. Public Law 106–390. 106th Congress. 30 Oct 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatsa KS, Joseph J (2003) Disaster management plan for the state of Maharashtra, India: evolutionary process. Nat Hazards Obs 206–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel F, Bendimerad F (2002) Earthquakes and megacities. In: Beer T, Ismail-Zadeh A (eds) Risk science and sustainability: science for reduction of risk and sustainable development of society, NATO science series. Kluwer/NATO Scientific Affairs Division, Dordrecht, pp 111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Westgate K (1981) Land-use planning, vulnerability and the low-income dwelling. In: Davis I (ed) Disasters and the small dwelling. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Wines M (2005) Zimbabwe police resume drive to raze slums. New York Times

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (WB), the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) (2010) Disaster risk management in Latin America and the Caribbean region: GFDRR country notes

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (WB) (2001) World development report: attacking poverty. Oxford University Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (WB) (2003) World Development report. Sustainable development in a dynamic world: transforming institutions, growth, and quality of life. Oxford University Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (WB) (2010) Natural hazards, unnatural disasters: the economics of effective prevention. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (WB) (2011) Climate change, disaster risk, and the urban poor. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD)/World Bank (WB), Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyner AJ, Mann DE 919860 Preparing for California’s Earthquakes: Local Government and Seismic Safety Institute for Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebru A. Gencer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gencer, E.A. (2013). Natural Disasters, Urban Vulnerability, and Risk Management: A Theoretical Overview. In: The Interplay between Urban Development, Vulnerability, and Risk Management. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace(), vol 7. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29470-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics