Skip to main content
Log in

Standardisation of the USGS Volcano Alert Level System (VALS): analysis and ramifications

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Volcanology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The standardisation of volcano early warning systems (VEWS) and volcano alert level systems (VALS) is becoming increasingly common at both the national and international level, most notably following UN endorsement of the development of globally comprehensive early warning systems. Yet, the impact on its effectiveness, of standardising an early warning system (EWS), in particular for volcanic hazards, remains largely unknown and little studied. This paper examines this and related issues through evaluation of the emergence and implementation, in 2006, of a standardised United States Geological Survey (USGS) VALS. Under this upper-management directive, all locally developed alert level systems or practices at individual volcano observatories were replaced with a common standard. Research conducted at five USGS-managed volcano observatories in Alaska, Cascades, Hawaii, Long Valley and Yellowstone explores the benefits and limitations this standardisation has brought to each observatory. The study concludes (1) that the process of standardisation was predominantly triggered and shaped by social, political, and economic factors, rather than in response to scientific needs specific to each volcanic region; and (2) that standardisation is difficult to implement for three main reasons: first, the diversity and uncertain nature of volcanic hazards at different temporal and spatial scales require specific VEWS to be developed to address this and to accommodate associated stakeholder needs. Second, the plural social contexts within which each VALS is embedded present challenges in relation to its applicability and responsiveness to local knowledge and context. Third, the contingencies of local institutional dynamics may hamper the ability of a standardised VALS to effectively communicate a warning. Notwithstanding these caveats, the concept of VALS standardisation clearly has continuing support. As a consequence, rather than advocating further commonality of a standardised VALS, we recommend adoption of a less prescriptive VALS that is scalable and sufficiently flexible for use by local stakeholders via standardised communication products designed to accommodate local contingency, while also adhering to national policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Semi-structured interviews were completed with a number of actors involved in the VALS: scientists within the USGS Volcano Hazard Program (VHP), including volcanologists, seismologists, glaciologists and chemists; with users of the VALS at other federal agencies; and with collaborative partners, such as Universities and State officials. There are a diverse range of VALS users, ranging from emergency managers to land owners (U.S. Forest Service, National Monuments, private land) who are generally local, to partner organisations (collaborative universities and institutes), state geologists and the National Weather Service (NWS), which are regionally at state level, and the aviation sector (VAACs and Air Traffic Control), which are national. The interviews provide insights into the personal perspectives of the variety of scientists and users involved in the design and implementation of the VALS. This is complemented by ethnographic observational data on the interactions between these different perspectives in practice, and document analysis on the historical emergence and stabilisation of these policies. Data are also derived from the archive released under the Freedom of Information Act (U.S. FOIA), including emails of different staff within the VHP that discuss the standardisation of the VALS.

  2. The Federal Register is available online, but only since 1994. Access to v.48. n197 from October 11, 1983 can only be provided by Federal depository libraries within the U.S. Outside the U.S., some major libraries may also carry the Federal Register.

  3. Still in effect (to date of writing), the official (bureau-level) USGS hazard notifications system can only issue a formal hazard warning, although no official warnings have been issued since the 1984 eruption of Mauna Loa, Hawaii on March 29 (email correspondence from Menlo Park scientist to standardisation committee in March 2003, U.S FOIA archives).

  4. The odd thing is that the NWS terms that usually describe meteorological hazards are not used to describe the ash hazards influenced by meteorological systems, but the ground hazards (AVO collaborator 3; 17/04/08).

References

  • Airport-technology.com (2010, 09 March) The world's top ten cargo hub airports. http://www.airport-technology.com/features/feature78850. Accessed 07 September 2010

  • Bailey RA, USGS (1983) The volcano hazards program: objectives and long-range plans. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, p 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakun WH (1988) Parkfield earthquake alert levels. Calif Geol 41(3):61–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakun WH, Breckenridge KS, Bredehoeft J, Burford RO, Ellsworth WL, Johnston MS, Jones L, Lindh AG, Mortensen C, Mueller RJ, Poley C, Roeloffs E, Schulz S, Segall P, Thatcher W (1987) Parkfield earthquake prediction scenarios and response plans. In: USGS Open-File Report 87–192. Menlo Park, CA

  • Brantley SR, Casadevall TJ, Geological Survey (U.S.) (1990) The eruption of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska, December 14, 1989–August 31, 1990. In: USGS Circular 1061. US GPO, Washington, Denver, CO, p 33

  • Casadevall TJ (1994) Volcanic ash and aviation safety: proceedings of the First International Symposium on Volcanic Ash and Aviation Safety. In: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2047. US GPO, Washington, Denver, CO, p 450

  • Department of Homeland Security (2008) National Incident Management System. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nims/NIMS_core.pdf

  • Ewert JW, Miller CD, Hendley II JW, Stauffer PH (2007) Mobile response team saves lives in volcano crises. In: US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 064-97. U.S. Geological Survey

  • US Forest Service (1992) Mt St Helens Contingency Plan

  • Fujimura JH (1987) Constructing ‘Do-Able’ problems in cancer research: articulating alignment. Soc Stud Sci 17(2):257–293. doi:10.1177/030631287017002003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner CA, Guffanti MC (2006) U.S. Geological Survey’s Alert Notification System for Volcanic Activity. In: Fact Sheet 2006-3139. U.S. Geological Survey

  • Gardner C, Guffanti M, Heliker C, Hill D, Lowenstern J, Murray T (2004) White Paper: Volcano alert-level notification within the Volcano Hazards Program: a report to look at the feasibility of a single unified system for all U.S. volcanoes. p 12

  • GNS (2010) Volcano alert levels explained. http://www.gns.cri.nz/what/earthact/volcanoes/alertl_1.html. Accessed 05 January 2010

  • Hawaii State Dept. of Health and County Civil Defense (2008) Emissions from Kilauea Volcano: brief summary of hazards and protective measures. http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/∼nat_haz/volcanoes/SO2Brochure.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2008

  • Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (2008) Hawaii Volcanoes National Park sulfur dioxide advisory program. http://www.nature.nps.gov/air/WebCams/parks/havoso2alert/havoadvisories.cfm. Accessed 25 June 2008

  • Heliker C, Grigg JD, Takahashi TJ, Wright TL (1968) Volcano monitoring at the U.S geological Survey’s Hawaiian volcano observatory. Earthquakes & Volcanoes 18:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill DP (1998) 1998 SSA Meeting—Presidential Address: Science, Geologic Hazards, and the Public in a Large, Restless Caldera. Seismol Res Lett 69(5). doi:10.1785/gssrl.69.5.400

  • Hill DPJ, M.J.S; Langbein, J.O; McNutt, S.R; Miller, C.D; Mortensen, C.E; Pitt, A.M; Rojstaczer, S. (1991) Response plans for volcanic hazards in the Long Valley Caldera and Mono Craters Area, California. In: Open File Report 91-270. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey

  • Hill DP, Dzurisin D, Ellsworth WL, Endo ET, Galloway DL, Gerlach TM, Johnston MJS, Langbein J, McGee K, Miller CD, Oppenheimer D, Sorey ML (2002) Response plan for volcano hazards in the Long Valley Caldera and Mono Craters region, California. In: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2185. U.S. Dept. of the Interior

  • Hogle LF (1995) Standardization across non-standard domains: the case of organ procurement. Sci Tech Hum Val 20(4):482–500. doi:10.1177/016224399502000405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICAO (2004) Handbook on the International Airways Volcano Watch (IAVW) and Annex 15

  • ICAO (2005) Second meeting of the international airways volcano watch operations group (IAVWOPSG). Lima, Peru

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Meteorological Agency (2010) Volcanic warnings and volcanic alert levels. http://www.seisvol.kishou.go.jp/tokyo/STOCK/kaisetsu/English/level.html. Accessed 06 January 2010

  • Keith TEC (1995) The 1992 eruptions of Crater Peak vent, Mount Spurr volcano, Alaska. US GPO; U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Denver, CO, p 220

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart AB, Murray TL (2004) The Puyallup River Valley Pilot Lahar Detection System. In: Open File Report 2004-1028. USGS, Reston, Virginia

  • Marcus GE (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annu Rev Anthropol 24:95–117. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhall CG, Dzurisin D (1988) Historical unrest at large calderas of the World. In: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin 1855. US GPO, Washington, D.C.

  • Scott KM, Macías JL, Naranjo JA, Rodriguez S, McGeehin JP (2001) Catastrophic debris flows transformed from landslides in volcanic terrains: mobility, hazard assessment and mitigation strategies. In: Professional Paper 1630 USGS, Reston, Virginia

  • Sorey ML, Farrar CD, Gerlach TM, McGee KA, Evans WC, Colvard EM, Hill DP, Bailey R, Rogie JD, Hendley II JW, Stauffer PH (1996) Invisible CO2 gas killing trees at Mammoth Mountain, California. In: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 172-96. U.S Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia

  • Steenblik JW (1990) Volcanic ash: a rain of terra. In: Airline Pilot June/July, pp. 9–15

  • Tilling RI, Heliker CC, Wright TL (1987) Eruptions of Hawaiian volcanoes: past, present, and future. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, p 54

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans S, Berg M (1997) Standardization in action: achieving local universality through medical protocols. Soc Stud Sci 27(2):273–305. doi:10.1177/030631297027002003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans S, Epstein S (2010) A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annu Rev Sociol 36(1):69–89. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troise C, De Natale G, Kilburn CRJ (2006) Mechanisms of activity and unrest at large calderas. Geological Society, London, p 198

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDRO (1985) Volcanic emergency management. UNDRO, New York, US, p 87

  • US Department of Homeland Security (2010) Department of Homeland Security Advisory System. http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/Copy_of_press_release_0046.shtm#5. Accessed 6 May 2010.

  • Waythomas CF, Power JA, Richter DH, McGimsey RG (1998) Preliminary volcano-hazard assessment for Akutan Volcano east-central Aleutian Islands, Alaska. In: Open-File Report 98-0360. Alaska Volcano Observatory, USGS, Anchorage, Alaska, p 36

  • USGS VHP Website (2008) The consortium of U.S. volcano observatories. http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/vhp/cusvo.php. Accessed 31 March 2008

  • WOVO (2008) Volcano alert levels. http://www.wovo.org/volcanic-alert-levels.html. Accessed 06 September 2008

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks must be given to Deborah Dixon and Nick Pearce for their critical comments and suggestions, and to the two reviewers who provided valuable insights to help strengthen the paper and its appeal. This research would not have been possible without the guidance of Bill McGuire, John Twigg and Gail Davies at University College London. Finally, staff from the USGS volcano hazard program, along with numerous users of the volcano alert level systems, many at U.S. federal agencies, dedicated hours to this research across all five observatories, and thanks must be given for their generosity and kind hospitality during my fieldwork. Carina Fearnley’s thesis, ‘Standardising the USGS Volcano Alert Level System: acting in the context of risk, uncertainty and complexity’, was funded by an interdisciplinary grant between the UK Natural Environment and Economic and Social Research Councils (NERC and ESRC), project no. PTA-036-2006-00040 and was completed at the Aon Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre at UCL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. J. Fearnley.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: S. De la Cruz-Reyna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fearnley, C.J., McGuire, W.J., Davies, G. et al. Standardisation of the USGS Volcano Alert Level System (VALS): analysis and ramifications. Bull Volcanol 74, 2023–2036 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-012-0645-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-012-0645-6

Keywords

Navigation