Agbabi, P. and Chaucer, G. (2015) Telling tales. Edinburgh: Canongate.
Ali, S. (2016) Refugee Tales. [Place of publication not identified]: Comma Press. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&accId=8661456&isbn=9781910974636.
Barrington, Candace; Hsy, Jonathan. (2015) ‘Remediated verse: Chaucer’s Tale of Melibee and Patience Agbabi’s “Unfinished Business”’, Postmedieval, 6(2), pp. 136–145. Available at: https://literature.proquest.com/searchFulltext.do?id=R05521248&divLevel=0&area=abell&forward=critref_ft.
Butterfield, A. (2009) Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language, and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2460386370002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415.
Chaucer, G. and Benson, L.D. (2008) The riverside Chaucer. 3rd ed. [with a new foreword by Christopher Cannon]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, H. (1989) The Canterbury tales. Oxford: Clarendon.
D’Arcens, L. (ed.) (2016) The Cambridge companion to medievalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emery, E. and Utz, R.J. (eds) (2017) Medievalism: key critical terms. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Goldie, M.B. (2003) Middle English literature: an historical sourcebook. Oxford: Blackwell.
Greenlaw, L. (2015) A double sorrow: Troilus and Criseyde. London: Faber & Faber. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780571284566.
Holsinger, B.W. (2014) A burnable book. London: Harper.
Justice, S. (1994) ‘Insurgency Remembered’, in Writing and rebellion: England in 1381. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 193–254.
Lerer, S. (2008) The Yale companion to Chaucer. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
Matthews, D. (2017) Medievalism: a critical history. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Miller, R.P. (1977) Chaucer: sources and backgrounds. New York: Oxford University Press.
Minnis, A.J. (1988) Medieval theory of authorship: scholastic literary attitudes in the later Middle Ages. 2nd ed. Aldershot: Wildwood House.
Patterson, L. (2006) ‘“What man artow?”: authorial self-definition in The Tale of Sir Thopas and The Tale of Melibee.’, in Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales. Palgrave, pp. 97–128.
Paul Strohm (2000) ‘Chaucer’s Troilus as Temporal Archive’, in Theory and the Premodern Text. University of Minnesota Press, pp. 80–96. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ABER/reader.action?docID=310523&ppg=66.
Pugh, T. and Weisl, A.J. (2013) Medievalisms: making the past in the present. London: Routledge.
Scala, E. (2016) Desire in the Canterbury Tales. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Trigg, S. (2016) ‘Medievalism and Theories of Temporality’, in L. Darcens (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Medievalism. Cambridge University Press, pp. 196–209.
Turner, M. (2007) Chaucerian conflict: languages of antagonism in late fourteenth-century London. Oxford: Clarendon. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3586452850002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415.
Turner, M. (ed.) (2013) A handbook of Middle English studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2422473300002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415.
Windeatt, B.A. (1992) Oxford guides to Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde. Oxford: Clarendon Press.